A couple weeks ago, I received an email from an initiative called "My Fellow American". The email purported to contain a "message of peace in a short video and a pledge of tolerance" in memory of 9/11. Given the use of the words "peace and tolerance" in reference to 9/11, I figured it was just some nonsense. I didn't really have time to look into, so I didn't watch the video.
Hello
In memory of the tenth anniversary of 9/11, I would like to offer you and your readers of Fatwa On islam a message of peace in a short video and a pledge of tolerance.
http://myfellowamerican.us
If you are able to post or tweet about the video and the pledge, please let me know. I am here if you have any questions.
Thank you so much,
Elizabeth
--
Elizabeth Potter
Unity Productions Foundation
myfellowamerican.us
facebook.com/MyFellowAmericanProject
@usmuslimstories
In memory of the tenth anniversary of 9/11, I would like to offer you and your readers of Fatwa On islam a message of peace in a short video and a pledge of tolerance.
http://myfellowamerican.us
If you are able to post or tweet about the video and the pledge, please let me know. I am here if you have any questions.
Thank you so much,
Elizabeth
--
Elizabeth Potter
Unity Productions Foundation
myfellowamerican.us
facebook.com/MyFellowAmericanProject
@usmuslimstories
I had completely forgotten about the email. I probably never would have remembered to go back, find the email, and watch the video. However, a few days later, I received a "follow up" email, which, once again, presented for my acceptance this supposed video message of rainbows, sunshine, and unicorns.
It turns out, the so-called video of "peace and tolerance" is nothing more than a transparent attempt to enrage Muslims and shame the infidels who are too ignorant to know any better. The narrative is right out of the Muslim Brotherhood's playbook. In the video, Muslims are made the victims, those speaking out against the horrors of Sharia are vilified, and the "tolerance" guilt trip is leveraged to the fullest extent...
After watching the video and finding myself significantly irritated by the crap propaganda, I decided I would take up on the offer to submit any questions I had...
Hi Elizabeth,
Yes, I do have a few questions....
1. Does your organization recognize and reject the punitive aspects of Sharia law as both primitive and barbaric?
For example:
a) Dismemberment for theft
b) Execution of homosexuals
c) Pubic lashings for premarital sex and alcohol consumption
2. Tarek Fatah, Zuhdi Jasser, as well as other reformist Muslims, have warned of the Muslim Brotherhood. What is your organization's stance on the Ikhwan, the subversive Jihadist ideology they preach, and their long standing effort to invade and destory western civilization?
3. Western values and Judeo-Christian morals conflict with Sharia and Islam in some undenaiable ways. There is a great moral chasm and divide between the two sides. For compromise and peace, there must be a theological basis for reconciliation. How has your organization reconciled the inescable and glaring differences, as highlighted in these example below?
a) Among the most disturbing facts about Islam, and it's prophet, is the well know marriage of Muhammad to a mere child of 6 years old (Aisha), and the so-called "consumation" of the vows when she was still just a little girl (only 9). This barbaric kind of child abuse is called molestation and rape by western values and it is diamtrically opposed to Judeo-Christian morality. How can this difference be settled?
b) For around 1400 years, the Muslim woman has been considered worth half a man, and property of some Muslim male. Muhammad specificially commanded obedient Muslims men to "beat" their wives if they are the mouthy type. Western civilization considers men and woman to be different, but not one more valuable than another, or property of anyone. Where is the common ground?
Thank you in advance for answering my questions.
And feel free to call into my show as a caller, or schedule a time to come on as a guest. While I stand in completely opposition to Islam, and I willingly spend all my free time fighting against Islamic Jihad (in all it's forms), I promise to behave civily toward Muslims and groups who call my show. There will be nothing but tough questions and a forceful argument against the ideology of allah, but I promise to maintain an atomosphere consistent with intellectual argument and ideological debate.
Jarrad Winter
Fatwa On Islam
http://www.fatwaonislam.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/JihadSubversion
http://www.facebook.com/FatwaOnIslam
Tyranny's Nemesis
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/tyrannysnemesis
http://nemesis.defendfreedom.info/
Defend Freedom
http://www.defendfreedom.info/
http://threatmatrix.defendfreedom.info/
Twitter
http://twitter.com/#!/JarradWinter
Yes, I do have a few questions....
1. Does your organization recognize and reject the punitive aspects of Sharia law as both primitive and barbaric?
For example:
a) Dismemberment for theft
b) Execution of homosexuals
c) Pubic lashings for premarital sex and alcohol consumption
2. Tarek Fatah, Zuhdi Jasser, as well as other reformist Muslims, have warned of the Muslim Brotherhood. What is your organization's stance on the Ikhwan, the subversive Jihadist ideology they preach, and their long standing effort to invade and destory western civilization?
3. Western values and Judeo-Christian morals conflict with Sharia and Islam in some undenaiable ways. There is a great moral chasm and divide between the two sides. For compromise and peace, there must be a theological basis for reconciliation. How has your organization reconciled the inescable and glaring differences, as highlighted in these example below?
a) Among the most disturbing facts about Islam, and it's prophet, is the well know marriage of Muhammad to a mere child of 6 years old (Aisha), and the so-called "consumation" of the vows when she was still just a little girl (only 9). This barbaric kind of child abuse is called molestation and rape by western values and it is diamtrically opposed to Judeo-Christian morality. How can this difference be settled?
b) For around 1400 years, the Muslim woman has been considered worth half a man, and property of some Muslim male. Muhammad specificially commanded obedient Muslims men to "beat" their wives if they are the mouthy type. Western civilization considers men and woman to be different, but not one more valuable than another, or property of anyone. Where is the common ground?
Thank you in advance for answering my questions.
And feel free to call into my show as a caller, or schedule a time to come on as a guest. While I stand in completely opposition to Islam, and I willingly spend all my free time fighting against Islamic Jihad (in all it's forms), I promise to behave civily toward Muslims and groups who call my show. There will be nothing but tough questions and a forceful argument against the ideology of allah, but I promise to maintain an atomosphere consistent with intellectual argument and ideological debate.
Jarrad Winter
Fatwa On Islam
http://www.fatwaonislam.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/JihadSubversion
http://www.facebook.com/FatwaOnIslam
Tyranny's Nemesis
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/tyrannysnemesis
http://nemesis.defendfreedom.info/
Defend Freedom
http://www.defendfreedom.info/
http://threatmatrix.defendfreedom.info/
http://twitter.com/#!/JarradWinter
I waited a couple days and nothing came back in regards to my questions, so I sent a follow up email...
Hi Elizabeth,
I'm following up on my response to your email and follow up email. I plan to discuss your organization and the issues around organizations such as yours, in both blog form and on my show this weekend. I would really like to have a direct statement from your organization about the issues I raised and the questions I posed.
I do not want to speculate as to your stance on those critical matters, but the non-answer provided by the vast majority of Muslims and Muslim-supporting groups is a legitimate cause for concern. It that regard, it's well worth exploring and raising public awareness.
Thank you,
Jarrad
I'm following up on my response to your email and follow up email. I plan to discuss your organization and the issues around organizations such as yours, in both blog form and on my show this weekend. I would really like to have a direct statement from your organization about the issues I raised and the questions I posed.
I do not want to speculate as to your stance on those critical matters, but the non-answer provided by the vast majority of Muslims and Muslim-supporting groups is a legitimate cause for concern. It that regard, it's well worth exploring and raising public awareness.
Thank you,
Jarrad
The second attempt resulted in a response, a very predictable response...
Jarrad,
While I am sorry for reaching out to you more than once, I don't know if it is a good idea since the name of your blog is by its very nature very violent in itself and while we may well be speaking to the tolerance and acceptance on American and immigrant Muslims, we're neither theologians nor are we representatives of Islam.
Take care,
Elizabeth
While I am sorry for reaching out to you more than once, I don't know if it is a good idea since the name of your blog is by its very nature very violent in itself and while we may well be speaking to the tolerance and acceptance on American and immigrant Muslims, we're neither theologians nor are we representatives of Islam.
Take care,
Elizabeth
I specifically asked for their organization to take a stand against things such as barbaric violence, abuse of women, and the execution of gay people. Predictably, their response was to try to make it about me and deflect blame away from Islam.
It's always the same, whenever Muslims and their enablers get put on the ropes with facts, logic, and reason, they always react in the same way. They attack and go on a character assassination binge, crying RACISIM, BIGOTRY, ISLAMOPHOBIA, and DANGEROUS RIGHT-WING EXTREMIST.
Truthfully, the nonsense is getting old and losing all effect, but the minions and their enablers have thus far decided to continue the charade, even in absence of effectiveness.
Anyway, in response to the attack, I sent the following email, and started researching the people behind the "message"...
Hi Elizabeth,
I would like to take issue with your assertions that my blog name is violent in nature. "Fatwa" is defined as a religious ruling, from a recognized authority on Islam. It is true, Islamic execution orders come in the form of a fatwa, but fatwas are issued for all aspects of Muslim life and for all sorts of other reasons, besides just "authorizing" murder. The title of my blog is to be interpreted as written, "ruling" or "judgment" on Islam.
You say you are preaching "tolerance", but refuse to take a stand against the aspect of Sharia law which mandates the murder of homosexuals. There is no legitmate intellectual basis from which you can claim to be on the side of tolerance with that being the case.
Al-Tirmidhi (Hadith 1456) The Prophet said, "Kill the one who sodomizes and the one who lets it be done to him"
I specifically asked you take a stand against the abuse of women that is mandated by allah's law and you did not. Personally, I refuse to tolerate subjigation of women or an such insanity that is mandated by Islam.
Qur'an (4:34) Men are in charge of women by what Allah has given one over the other and what they spend from their wealth. So righteous women are devoutly obedient, guarding in absence what Allah would have them guard. But those from whom you fear arrogance - advise them; forsake them in bed; and STRIKE THEM. But if they obey you, seek no means against them. Indeed, Allah is ever Exalted and Grand.
I brought to your attention and requested comment on the public beatings which imbue Sharia Law, and got nothing (except an attempted attack on me).
Qur'an (24:2) The [unmarried] woman or [unmarried] man found guilty of sexual intercourse - lash each one of them with a hundred lashes, and do not be taken by pity for them in the religion of Allah , if you should believe in Allah and the Last Day. And let a group of the believers witness their punishment.
I tolerate all non-violent and non-subversive ideologies, every color, whatever religion, sexual orientation and people from every country. I am by definition tolerant. In my judgement, your organization is preaching a notion that directly leads to persecution and intolerance, because that is the core message of Islam. I'm intolerant of Islam, because that's the only sane thing to be.
Muslims bring Islam, Islam bring Islamism, Islamism creates terrorists and subversives, and then people die. That is the pattern, it's world wide, and stretches back 1400 years to the initial conquests during Muhammad's times. The 3 D's of Islam are Death, Destruction, and Despair. It's been that way since it's inception.
Bukhari (v.4 b.52 n.196) Allah 's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,' and whoever says, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,' his life and property will be saved by me except for Islamic law, and his accounts will be with Allah, (either to punish him or to forgive him.)"
The 6th American president, and son of a Founding Father, John Q. Adams summed it up best....
"The precept of the koran is, perpetual war against all who deny, that Mahomet is the prophet of God. The vanquished may purchase their lives, by the payment of tribute; the victorious may be appeased by a false and delusive promise of peace; and the faithful follower of the prophet, may submit to the imperious necessities of defeat: but the command to propagate the Moslem creed by the sword is always obligatory, when it can be made effective." -John Q. Adams
"The commands of the prophet may be performed alike, by fraud, or by force. Of Mahometan good faith, we have had memorable examples ourselves." -John Q. Adams
American Annual Register Years 1827-9
Archive: http://i.fat-wa.me/AdamsOnMuzz
"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." -Thomas Mann
Tolerating Islam is to tolerate the destruction of western civilization and the freedoms that America has secured in over 200 years of striving and growing. That is nonsense-tolerance, and it paves the way for the eradication of all tolerance and diversity.
Jarrad Winter
I would like to take issue with your assertions that my blog name is violent in nature. "Fatwa" is defined as a religious ruling, from a recognized authority on Islam. It is true, Islamic execution orders come in the form of a fatwa, but fatwas are issued for all aspects of Muslim life and for all sorts of other reasons, besides just "authorizing" murder. The title of my blog is to be interpreted as written, "ruling" or "judgment" on Islam.
You say you are preaching "tolerance", but refuse to take a stand against the aspect of Sharia law which mandates the murder of homosexuals. There is no legitmate intellectual basis from which you can claim to be on the side of tolerance with that being the case.
Al-Tirmidhi (Hadith 1456) The Prophet said, "Kill the one who sodomizes and the one who lets it be done to him"
I specifically asked you take a stand against the abuse of women that is mandated by allah's law and you did not. Personally, I refuse to tolerate subjigation of women or an such insanity that is mandated by Islam.
Qur'an (4:34) Men are in charge of women by what Allah has given one over the other and what they spend from their wealth. So righteous women are devoutly obedient, guarding in absence what Allah would have them guard. But those from whom you fear arrogance - advise them; forsake them in bed; and STRIKE THEM. But if they obey you, seek no means against them. Indeed, Allah is ever Exalted and Grand.
I brought to your attention and requested comment on the public beatings which imbue Sharia Law, and got nothing (except an attempted attack on me).
Qur'an (24:2) The [unmarried] woman or [unmarried] man found guilty of sexual intercourse - lash each one of them with a hundred lashes, and do not be taken by pity for them in the religion of Allah , if you should believe in Allah and the Last Day. And let a group of the believers witness their punishment.
I tolerate all non-violent and non-subversive ideologies, every color, whatever religion, sexual orientation and people from every country. I am by definition tolerant. In my judgement, your organization is preaching a notion that directly leads to persecution and intolerance, because that is the core message of Islam. I'm intolerant of Islam, because that's the only sane thing to be.
Muslims bring Islam, Islam bring Islamism, Islamism creates terrorists and subversives, and then people die. That is the pattern, it's world wide, and stretches back 1400 years to the initial conquests during Muhammad's times. The 3 D's of Islam are Death, Destruction, and Despair. It's been that way since it's inception.
Bukhari (v.4 b.52 n.196) Allah 's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,' and whoever says, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,' his life and property will be saved by me except for Islamic law, and his accounts will be with Allah, (either to punish him or to forgive him.)"
The 6th American president, and son of a Founding Father, John Q. Adams summed it up best....
"The precept of the koran is, perpetual war against all who deny, that Mahomet is the prophet of God. The vanquished may purchase their lives, by the payment of tribute; the victorious may be appeased by a false and delusive promise of peace; and the faithful follower of the prophet, may submit to the imperious necessities of defeat: but the command to propagate the Moslem creed by the sword is always obligatory, when it can be made effective." -John Q. Adams
"The commands of the prophet may be performed alike, by fraud, or by force. Of Mahometan good faith, we have had memorable examples ourselves." -John Q. Adams
American Annual Register Years 1827-9
Archive: http://i.fat-wa.me/AdamsOnMuzz
"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." -Thomas Mann
Tolerating Islam is to tolerate the destruction of western civilization and the freedoms that America has secured in over 200 years of striving and growing. That is nonsense-tolerance, and it paves the way for the eradication of all tolerance and diversity.
Jarrad Winter
Unity Productions & My Fellow American
Unity Productions is the 501(c)3 behind the "My Fellow American" propaganda campaign. The organization was founded by two Muslim converts, Alexander Kronemer and Michael Wolfe. And it's very simple to establish that Unity Productions has worked on several "projects" with the Muslim Brotherhood and activitly participates in "Civilization Jihad"
ISNA, CAIR, MSA, are just a few of the Jihadist organizations that can be quickly linked to Unity. The Islam Project, a project produced in part by Unity Productions, acknowledges quite a few Muslim Brotherhood front groups and lists them as resources for additional information on Islam.
"Ground Zero Mosque Dialogue" is another Jihad propaganda project laden with the fingerprints of Unity Productions and stealth Jihad.
Taking a quick peak at Micheal Wolfe's Facebook page, affirms the Muslim Brotherhood connection, as references to ISNA litter the page.
Clearly, those behind this "My Fellow American" initiative are Jihad-waging Muslim propagandists with direct ties to Jihadists who have pledged to destroy the West from within. In a sane world, every Muslim associated with this group would be arrested and charged with treason. Unfortunately, no such world exists at the present time in history.
BTW, I did send one final message to the Muslim subversives and explained things as directly as possible...
Hi Elizabeth,
I have researched your parent group (unity), the founders of said group, and have that situation pretty well mapped out. I have no questions in that regard, just hoping to understand your angle a bit. As to my back and forth with you, I'm hoping to put a truthful perspective in front of my readers and listeners. In that quest, I have one final question, are you a Muslim? Of course you don't have to answer and the question will only be asked once. However, I would hope to not have to infer, so I ask.
My upcoming report, blog post, and segment on my show will communicate the following (in general)
After providing "My Fellow American" with ample opportunity to take a stand against Sharia Law, which unequivocally endorses unfettered child molestation (and barely "fettered" kiddy-rape), spousal abuse, hatred/execution of gay people, murder of those who leave Islam, and endless war against the non-believers, it is safe to say this group is part of the problem, and should be shamed out of existence for their hatred.
The Muslims and Leftists behind it should be hounded until they issue a formal apology to gay people, Islamic apostates, and the women of Islam who are enslaved by Muhammad's words that they be beaten if they protest or think for themselves.
In closing, I would like to add the following...
As a REAL American, US Marine, and proudly TOLERANT, I am disgusted by your organization and what horrors it stands for.
Thank you,
Jarrad Winter
I have researched your parent group (unity), the founders of said group, and have that situation pretty well mapped out. I have no questions in that regard, just hoping to understand your angle a bit. As to my back and forth with you, I'm hoping to put a truthful perspective in front of my readers and listeners. In that quest, I have one final question, are you a Muslim? Of course you don't have to answer and the question will only be asked once. However, I would hope to not have to infer, so I ask.
My upcoming report, blog post, and segment on my show will communicate the following (in general)
After providing "My Fellow American" with ample opportunity to take a stand against Sharia Law, which unequivocally endorses unfettered child molestation (and barely "fettered" kiddy-rape), spousal abuse, hatred/execution of gay people, murder of those who leave Islam, and endless war against the non-believers, it is safe to say this group is part of the problem, and should be shamed out of existence for their hatred.
The Muslims and Leftists behind it should be hounded until they issue a formal apology to gay people, Islamic apostates, and the women of Islam who are enslaved by Muhammad's words that they be beaten if they protest or think for themselves.
In closing, I would like to add the following...
As a REAL American, US Marine, and proudly TOLERANT, I am disgusted by your organization and what horrors it stands for.
Thank you,
Jarrad Winter
No comments:
Post a Comment